Debate 12/16/13
Collin & Shawn vs. Amber & Andrea.
Pro: They should be allowed to go through your phones to bust people on drug deals, inappropriate pictures, underage drinking, child abuse, or plans of crime.
Con: They should not be allowed to search through your phone because it is an invasion of privacy. Some searching for probable cause is okay, but not searching for no reason.
Crossfire: Whether there is no probable cause or not, searching can stop many other things other than just the obvious. With allowing searches at any time, they can find out much more and prevent more. Because with people knowing that their phone can only be searched for probable cause, they will use code words and dance around what is really about to happen.
Pro Rebuttal: There is no reason for them to search your personal things, so why should they be allowed? You things could get in the wrong hands and make things difficult for you.
Con Rebuttal: They aren't searching for things to ruin your life, they are looking to stop and solve crimes or possible crimes. That's all.
Pro Closing: Your things and personal items should not be searched unless there is a reason. Period.
Con Closing: If you have nothing to hide then having your things searched should not be a problem. It can stop bad things from happening before they do.
Monday, December 16, 2013
BR 12/13/13
1.) Nelson Mandela died.
A.) He was the first black president in South America.
B.) He was a South African anti-apartheid revolutionary, politician, and philanthropist.
2.) Navy Yard shooter fired indiscriminately.
A.) Aaron Alexis attacked with an 870 Remington shotgun with no apparent purpose.
B.) He shot 12 people and a security guard.
3.)
1.) Nelson Mandela died.
A.) He was the first black president in South America.
B.) He was a South African anti-apartheid revolutionary, politician, and philanthropist.
2.) Navy Yard shooter fired indiscriminately.
A.) Aaron Alexis attacked with an 870 Remington shotgun with no apparent purpose.
B.) He shot 12 people and a security guard.
3.)
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
BR 12/11/13
1.) It is different and separate rights. The police should not be allowed to "snoop" unless there is probable cause. I don't understand why everyone is so worried about "snooping" or having your phone "snooped" through unless there would be a reason to search?
2.) Yes, privacy is definitely a thing of the past now-a-days. We make our "private" and personal lives very public, also we can have our things looked at when there is supposedly a "probable cause."
3.) So they can play a video game, and there might be people hiding in plain sight.
4.) Call of Duty because there are racial slurs.
1.) It is different and separate rights. The police should not be allowed to "snoop" unless there is probable cause. I don't understand why everyone is so worried about "snooping" or having your phone "snooped" through unless there would be a reason to search?
2.) Yes, privacy is definitely a thing of the past now-a-days. We make our "private" and personal lives very public, also we can have our things looked at when there is supposedly a "probable cause."
3.) So they can play a video game, and there might be people hiding in plain sight.
4.) Call of Duty because there are racial slurs.
Monday, December 9, 2013
BR 12/9/13
1.) No, the NSA should not be allowed to be in there snooping around unless there is a warrant or probable cause. Why would they want to serach unless there was a reason anyway? I feel like if they were looking "just because" they would find out information or private things that aren't meant for eveyeones eyes, or something that could get them in trouble.
2.) Tech companies would be against it because there is probably codes and secret information that they don't want to risk people finding out.
1.) No, the NSA should not be allowed to be in there snooping around unless there is a warrant or probable cause. Why would they want to serach unless there was a reason anyway? I feel like if they were looking "just because" they would find out information or private things that aren't meant for eveyeones eyes, or something that could get them in trouble.
2.) Tech companies would be against it because there is probably codes and secret information that they don't want to risk people finding out.
Friday, December 6, 2013
BR 12/6/13
I saw that Nelson Mandela passed away on the news yesterday, and I didn't even know who he was. After reading this article, he has done some major monumental things. He won a nobel prize for all the things he had accomplished. Such as, being the first blak president in South Africa, he vowed to seek peace with South Africa's whites, guided South Africa to a new democratic government guarnteeing equal rights to all citizens, one of the world's most recognizable statesmen of the 20th century, and a hero of South African democracy.
I saw that Nelson Mandela passed away on the news yesterday, and I didn't even know who he was. After reading this article, he has done some major monumental things. He won a nobel prize for all the things he had accomplished. Such as, being the first blak president in South Africa, he vowed to seek peace with South Africa's whites, guided South Africa to a new democratic government guarnteeing equal rights to all citizens, one of the world's most recognizable statesmen of the 20th century, and a hero of South African democracy.
Wednesday, December 4, 2013
BR 12/4/13
1.) I don't think it would have had a similar outcome in the US because the case would not have been taken that far. I don't think our court system would even listen to the fathers side for any other reason than humor.
2.) I think that this father is selfish and mean for suing the mother of his child just because he thought the baby was too ugly. He should have known about the surgery, I'll give him that, but he should love them for more than just their looks.
1.) I don't think it would have had a similar outcome in the US because the case would not have been taken that far. I don't think our court system would even listen to the fathers side for any other reason than humor.
2.) I think that this father is selfish and mean for suing the mother of his child just because he thought the baby was too ugly. He should have known about the surgery, I'll give him that, but he should love them for more than just their looks.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)